Validity and reliability of the Pandemic Fatigue Scale (PFS) in the Turkish population
Citation
KURT, M. E., ÇAPAR, H., ÇAKMAK, C., TÜRKEN, A., & MENTEŞ, N. (2022). Validity and reliability of the Pandemic Fatigue Scale (PFS) in the Turkish population. Work, 74(4), 1309–1319. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-211438Abstract
Abstract.
BACKGROUND: The measures developed to fight the COVID-19 pandemic caused fear, stress and anxiety in people
over time. It was reported that pandemic fatigue, associated with the gradual loss of motivation to follow the implemented
protective measures, emerged in societies.
OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional-methodological study aimed to validate the Turkish version of the Pandemic Fatigue
Scale, developed by Lilleholt et al. (2020).
METHODS: A web-based questionnaire was conducted to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the
PFS. 1149 participants from all regions in Turkey participated. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor
Analysis (CFA) were performed.
RESULTS: As a result of the KMO and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity, the scale was suitable for the factor analysis. According
to EFA, the scale has two sub-factors. The first sub-factor explained 48.7%, and the second sub-factor explained 16.7% of
the total variance. Factor loadings of items varied between 0.67 and 0.89. CFA shows that acceptable fit values were obtained
for the RMSEA, GFI, AGFI, CFI, NFI and IFI fit indices.
CONCLUSIONS: The results support that PFS is a valid and reliable screening tool that can be used to measure the
phenomenon of pandemic fatigue