A deep learning approach for hydrological time-series prediction: A case study of Gilgit river basin

dc.contributor.authorHussain, Dostdar
dc.contributor.authorHussain, Tahir
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Aftab Ahmed
dc.contributor.authorNaqvi, Syed Ali Asad
dc.contributor.authorJamil, Akhtar
dc.date.accessioned2020-12-20T06:49:41Z
dc.date.available2020-12-20T06:49:41Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentMühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesien_US
dc.descriptionWOS:000541035800001en_US
dc.description.abstractStreamflow prediction is a significant undertaking for water resources planning and management. Accurate forecasting of streamflow always being a challenging task for the hydrologist due to its high stochasticity and dynamic patterns. Several traditional and the deep learning models have been applied to simulate the complex nature of the hydrological system. However, to develop and explore a better expert system for prediction is a continuous exertion for hydrological studies. In this study, a deep neural network, namely a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) and extreme learning machine (ELM) are explored for one-step-ahead streamflow forecasting for three-time horizons (daily, weekly and monthly) in Gilgit River, Pakistan. The 1D-CNN model gained incredible popularity due to its state-of-the-art performance and nominal computational complexity; while ELM model performed superfast as compared to traditional/deep learning architecture, gives comparable performance with fast execution rate. A comparative analysis is presented to assess the performance of the 1D-CNN related to the ELM model. The performance measurement matrices defined as the correlation coefficient (R-2), mean absolute error (MAE) and root mean square error (RMSE) computed between the observed and predicted streamflow to evaluate the 1D-CNN and ELM model efficacy. The results indicated that the ELM model performed relatively better than the 1D-CNN model based on predefined statistical measures in three-time scale. In numerical terms, the superiority of ELM over 1D-CNN model was demonstrated by R-2 = 0.99, MAE = 18.8, RMSE = 50.14, and R-2 = 0.97, MAE = 136.59, RMSE = 230.9, for daily streamflow (testing phase) respectively. Based on our findings, it can be concluded that the ELM model would be an alternative to the 1D-CNN model for highly accurate streamflow forecasting in mountainous regions of the world.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12145-020-00477-2
dc.identifier.endpage927en_US
dc.identifier.issn1865-0473
dc.identifier.issn1865-0481
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.orcidAkhtar Jamil |0000-0002-2592-1039
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage915en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-020-00477-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12436/1784
dc.identifier.volume13en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.institutionauthorJamil, Akhtar
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEarth Science Informaticsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectArtificial Neural Networken_US
dc.subject1D-Convolutional Neural Networken_US
dc.subjectExtreme Learning Machineen_US
dc.subjectStreamflow predictionen_US
dc.subjectGilgit Riveren_US
dc.titleA deep learning approach for hydrological time-series prediction: A case study of Gilgit river basinen_US
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Hussain-2020-A-deep-learning-approach-for-hydrol.pdf
Boyut:
2.45 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale dosyası / Article file