A comparative assessment of five different distributions based on five different optimization methods for modeling wind speed distribution

dc.authorscopusid57193868250
dc.authorscopusid57201775146
dc.authorwosidABG-8088-2020
dc.authorwosidKBB-0675-2024
dc.contributor.authorWadi, Mohammed
dc.contributor.authorElmasry, Wisam
dc.contributor.authorWadi, Mohammed
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-28T11:21:42Z
dc.date.available2022-12-28T11:21:42Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.departmentMühendislik ve Doğa Bilimleri Fakültesien_US
dc.description.abstractDetermining wind regime distribution patterns is essential for many reasons; modelling wind power potential is one of the most crucial. In that regard, Weibull, Gamma, and Rayleigh functions are the most widely used distributions for describing wind speed distribution. However, they could not be the best for describing all wind systems. Also, estimation methods play a significant role in deciding which distribution can achieve the best matching. Consequently, alternative distributions and estimation methods are required to be studied. An extensive analysis of five different distributions to describe the wind speeds distribution, namely Rayleigh, Weibull, Inverse Gaussian, Burr Type XII, and Generalized Pareto, are introduced in this study. Further, five metaheuristic optimization methods, Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm, Grey Wolf Optimization, Moth-Flame Optimization, Salp Swarm Algorithm, and Whale Optimization Algorithm, are employed to specify the optimum parameters per distribution. Five error criteria and seven statistical descriptors are utilized to compare the good-of-fitness of the introduced distributions. Therefore, this paper provides different important methods to estimate the wind potential at any site.en_US
dc.identifier.citationWadi, M. & Elmasry, W. (2024). A Comparative Assessment of Five Different Distributions Based on Five Different Optimization Methods for Modeling Wind Speed Distribution . Gazi University Journal of Science, 38(3) 1-1. DOI: 10.35378/gujs.1026834en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.35378/gujs.1026834
dc.identifier.issn2147-1762
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.orcidMohammed Wadi |0000-0001-8928-3729en_US
dc.identifier.orcidWisam Elmasry |0000-0002-0234-4099en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85166056270
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.1026834
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12436/4375
dc.identifier.volume36en_US
dc.identifier.wos001108851000007
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.institutionauthorWadi, Mohammed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherGazi Üniversitesien_US
dc.relation.ispartofGazi University Journal of Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectWind energy modellingen_US
dc.subjectPDFen_US
dc.subjectCDFen_US
dc.subjectGood of fitnessen_US
dc.subjectOptimization methoden_US
dc.titleA comparative assessment of five different distributions based on five different optimization methods for modeling wind speed distributionen_US
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication
relation.isAuthorOfPublicatione57e2394-09f4-4128-bdb4-84c708867a9f
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoverye57e2394-09f4-4128-bdb4-84c708867a9f

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
10.35378-gujs.1026834-2093503.pdf
Boyut:
1.54 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale dosyası / Article file

Lisans paketi

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: