Motives behind the return anomaly around bonus issue announcements: the case of emerging markets

dc.authorscopusid57192256835
dc.authorscopusid24476788000
dc.authorwosidISIKER, Murat/H-3515-2016
dc.contributor.authorIsiker, Murat
dc.contributor.authorTas, Oktay
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-04T19:12:22Z
dc.date.available2022-03-04T19:12:22Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.departmentİZÜen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose This paper aims to examine the stock return behaviour around the bonus issue announcements in eight emerging markets for 2010-2019 by addressing the signalling, cash substitution and liquidity hypotheses. Design/methodology/approach Besides using the standard event study technique to test the presence of an anomaly, country-based regression analyses are performed. Firm-specific factors are used to understand the motive behind the anomaly observed pre- and post-announcement periods. Also, the Amihud illiquidity measure examines the liquidity hypothesis, while standardized profitability and investment ratios compare the long-run operational performance of bonus issuers to test the validity of signalling. Findings The findings provide evidence that abnormal returns can be detected ten days before the announcement in some countries, which is a sign of information leakage. The presence of the effect continues only in two countries after the announcement is released. The size of the bonus issue is found strongly significant in most countries, while a weak relation between abnormal return and other factors is detected. Moreover, the signalling hypothesis does not hold in the sense of long-run profitability increase, while liquidity assertion is partially presented. Research limitations/implications Due to an inadequate number of announcements in other emerging markets, the number of sample countries is limited by eight. Originality/value The research is novel regarding analyzing a wide range of emerging countries with various variables. Also, the paper is distinguished from other studies by applying multiple set of regressions under nine different event windows.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/RBF-05-2020-0092
dc.identifier.issn1940-5979
dc.identifier.issn1940-5987
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85109360230en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1108/RBF-05-2020-0092
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12436/3176
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000672679900001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofReview of Behavioral Financeen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBonus issueen_US
dc.subjectEvent studyen_US
dc.subjectSignalling hypothesisen_US
dc.subjectCash substitutionen_US
dc.subjectLiquidity hypothesisen_US
dc.subjectStock dividendsen_US
dc.subjectSTOCK DIVIDENDSen_US
dc.subjectSPLITSen_US
dc.subjectSHAREen_US
dc.subjectNEWSen_US
dc.titleMotives behind the return anomaly around bonus issue announcements: the case of emerging marketsen_US
dc.typeArticle
dspace.entity.typePublication

Dosyalar